研究者詳細

教職員基本情報

氏名 Name	SOUSA，Domingos ( スザ　ドミンゴス , SOUSA,Domingos )
所属 Organization	人文学部キリスト教学科
職名 Academic Title	教授
専攻分野 Area of specialization	組織神学・仏教学
学会活動 Academic societies	日本宗教学会（2002）日本基督教学会（2004）日本カトリック神学会（2004）キェルケゴール協会（2006）
著書・学術論文数 No. of books/academic articles	総数 total number (26) 著書数 books (5) 学術論文数 articles (21)

出身大学院

大学院名 Grad. School	修了課程 Courses Completed	修了年月（日） Date of Completion	修了区分 Completion Classification
大谷大学大学院，真宗学専攻	博士後期課程	2004年03月	修了

詳細表示

取得学位

学位区分 Degree Classification	取得学位名 Degree name	学位論文名 Title of Thesis	学位授与機関 Organization Conferring the Degree	取得年月（日） Date of Acquisition
博士	博士（文学）	親鸞とキェルケゴール−信心と信仰の比較的考察−	大谷大学大学院	2004年03月
修士	修士（真宗学）		大谷大学大学院	2000年03月
修士	修士（神学）		南山大学大学院	1996年03月
学士	Theology 学士		Missionary Institute London	1991年06月

詳細表示

研究経歴

長期研究／短期研究 Long or Short Term research	研究課題名 Research Topic
長期研究	比較思想
概要（Abstract）東西両洋における諸思想の比較
短期研究	キェルケゴールと親鸞の思想の比較
概要（Abstract）両思想家が生きた時代も宗教的背景もまったく相違なるが、両者の思想の間には、構造の上で著しい類似点が見出される。研究は両者の思想の類似性と相違性とを明らかにしつつ、その宗教観を解明しようと試みるものである。

詳細表示

著書

年度 Year	著書名 Title of the books	著書形態 Form of Book	NeoCILIUS 請求番号／資料ID Request No
年度 Year	出版機関名 Publishing organization，判型 Book Size，頁数 No. of pp.，発行年月（日） Date
2014	親鸞とキェルケゴールにおける「信心」と「信仰」	単著	ISBN978-4-623-07219-4
	ミネルヴァ書房，その他， 280p. ， 2015/1/10
	概要（Abstract）信仰は通常の解釈では、諸宗教の根底に横たわる普遍的な現象と見做されている。しかし異なる宗教に応用し得る普遍的な信仰の概念があるのか。本書は、親鸞とキェルケゴールの思想の比較を通して浄土真宗における信心とキリスト教に信仰に通底する共通の本質「普遍的な信仰」を設定できるか否かを究明しようとするものである。宗教を文化的言語的枠組みとして捉える宗教理論の視座から考えて見ると、信心と信仰は同一経験を様々に象徴したものとしてではなく、異なる経験を形成する宗教的言語の枠組みと見做される。両概念を比較対照した上で、それらの類似性と相違点を明確にすると共に、宗教間の相互理解や対話が、どのような根拠の上に立って成立するのかを考察する。諸宗教間に通底する共通の本質や普遍的基準が存在しなくとも、コミュニケーションと対話の実践そのものにおいて共有される共通のアプローチが見出され、諸宗教の相互理解に到達することができると思われる。結局のところ、宗教間の相互理解や対話は、理論的に解明すべき困難ではなく、実践的な課題である。
	備考（Remarks）
2014	仏教的伝統と人間の生―親鸞思想研究への視座	共著	ISBN 978-4-8318-7702-4
	法藏館， A5 ， 313 p. ， 2014年06月7日
	概要（Abstract） One of the central questions in the current debate on religious pluralism is whether there is an essential unity or common denominator for world religions. Religious thinkers of various traditions have attempted to answer this question, insisting that some sort of common denominator for world religions is necessary so that mutual understanding between religions becomes possible. I argue that the attempt to reconcile differences among religions by defining in advance a common essence rests on the dubious assumption that there is a universal innate experience or conception of the ultimate reality common to all religions. While religions do not share a common essence they do share a common responsibility for helping to build a genuinely humane civilization. The common goal of creating a more humane social order provides the basis for encounter of the world religious traditions and, through dialogue, for discerning what is truly humanly significant in the respective religions
	備考（Remarks）本書は国内外の真宗学・隣接諸学の学者が、広い視野から真宗学の諸問題を考察する。この論集には親鸞思想と現代哲学・倫理学との対話的研究、イスラーム・キリスト教との比較研究、さらには親鸞思想の源流や文脈を明らかにする仏教文献学・仏教史学の論考に至るまで、多様な親鸞思想研究への視座が提示されている。日本語篇と英語篇に分かれる本書には竹内整一、長谷正當、ポール・B・ワット、トマス・P・カスーリスほか、２４名の学者が寄稿している。私の担当部分：英語篇　"Shin Buddhism in Dialogue with Christianity: The Quest for Common Ground", pp. 130-153 (24 p.)
2012	Religião e Cultura: Memórias e perspectivas	共著	ISBN 978-85-8229-014-9
	Editora PUCMinas ，その他， 240 ， 2012
	概要（Abstract） It is probably difficult to find a country that was so greatly influenced by other cultures and civilizations as Japan has been. In fact, the great changes that took place in Japanese history were the result of the encounter with other civilizations and cultures. The influences received, however, were never able to put into question the basic premises of Japanese culture. A value system that lacked a clear transcendental and universalistic orientation remained dominant. While in the west the transcendental dimension of Christianity exerted a strong influence in the creation of universal values in the light of which the sociopolitical reality was shaped, in Japan, Buddhism―the dominant religion throughout the feudal period―was never able to attain such hegemony and offer normative and universal values for the political and social order. In Japan the supreme value to which everything should be subjected is the political and social order of the nation. To be a faithful member of the social collectivity and contribute to the preservation of its harmony acquires a quasi-sacred value. Here resides the core essence of the religiosity of the Japanese people, often referred to as Nipponism. It was this cultural and religious matrix of an ethnocentric nature that enabled Japan to adopt many elements of western culture in order to modernize the nation and at the same time maintain its own cultural identity.
	備考（Remarks） The essays collected in this book were delivered at a conference held in the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (Brasil) in 2011 entitled “Religião e cultura: memórias e perspectivas”.My Paper entitled "Modernidade, Cultura e Religião na Ordem Política e Social do Japão" (Modernity, Culture and Religion in the Political and Social Order of Japan p. 123-151) was originally published in Horizonte, PUC Minas V. 9,(2011):870-890.
2009	Cristianismo no Japão: Universalismo Cristão e Cultura Nipónica	共著
	Fundação AIS & SVD ， A5 ， 196 ， 2009/11
	概要（Abstract） My paper entitled “Estado e Religião: Xintoísmo Estatal e a Formação do Mito da Identidade Nacional” (State and Religion: State Shinto and the Formation of the Myth of National Identity, p.83-106), tries to show how religion played an essential role in the formation of the modern Japan nation-state. In Western countries, with the creation of the nation-state in the XIX century, the relation between state and religion undergoes a radical change. The separation between state and religion becomes the condition for the formation of the nation-state. Modernization of society demands its secularization and religion is relegated to the non-political realm. The condition for the modernization of Japan, however, was not the secularization of society but its sacralization. The Meiji Restoration legitimizes the new political order on the basis of the divine origin of the emperor and the resulting reinvented traditional Shinto. Probably in no other modern nation did the state adopt and support in such a systematic manner a particular religion as the Japan state did to the point of converting Shinto into a powerful state ideology. Contrary to what happened in the western societies, in Japan religion was not an obstacle but a condition for the formation of a modern, secular society.
	備考（Remarks） The essays collected in this book were delivered at a conference held in Fátima (Portugal) in 2007 entitled “Cristianismo no Japão: Universalismo Cristão e Cultura Nipónica” (Christianity in Japan: Christian Universalism and Japanese Culture).
2004	Cristianismo na China: Percursos e Proximidades	共著
	Fundação AIS & SVD ， A5 ， 232 ， 2005/02
	概要（Abstract） My paper entitled “Budismo: Pontos de Contacto e Perspectivas de Diálogo com o Cristianismo” (Buddhism: Points of Contact and Prospects for Dialogue with Christianity, p. 83-103), examines the grounds for dialogue between Buddhism and Christianity. In the present day debate over religious pluralism, many scholars seek to justify the dialogue between religions on the basis of a common denominator. Such an approach fails to take into account the uniqueness of each religion. Religions are not variations of the same theme nor do they offer different answers to the same questions; they raise essentially different questions about the human condition and the nature of the ultimate reality. The starting point for Buddhism is the awareness of the reality of suffering which originates in the transitory nature of human life. For Christianity, however, the central problem is the reality of sin, brought about by human freedom which distorts the essential goodness of creation. Similarly, to reach enlightenment in Buddhism is not the same as experiencing salvation in Christ. Salvation in Christianity presupposes a personal identity and not its negation as in Buddhism. These and other differences make it clear that the doctrines of both religions cannot be conceived of as different expressions of the same or similar religious experience. The doctrines not only express but produce essential different religious experiences. Although Buddhism and Christianity do not share a common essence, they can and should share the same responsibility to fight the injustices, conflicts and divisions that afflict humanity. More than a common religiosity or common understanding of the ultimate reality, a joint response to the problems of humanity is the most fruitful way to promote dialogue between Buddhism and Christianity.
	備考（Remarks） The essays that compose this book were delivered at a conference held in Fátima (Portugal) in 2003 entitled “Christianismo na China: Percursos e Proximidades” (Christianity in China: A History of an Encounter).

詳細表示

学術論文

年度 Year	論文題目名 Title of the articles	共著区分 Collaboration Classification
年度 Year	掲載誌名 Journal name，出版機関名 Publishing organization，巻／号 Vol./no.，頁数 Page nos.，発行年月（日） Date
2023	O Repto de Kierkegaard à Teologia (Kierkegaard's Challenge to Theology)	単著
	Perspectiva Teológica ， FAJE, Belo Horizonte, Brasil ， Vol. 55, no. 3 ， pp.803-824 ， 2023/September/December
	概要（Abstract） Kierkegaard styled himself as a poet and Christian thinker, whose orientation was primarily philosophical and theological. Rather than aiming to interpret the truth of faith in a conceptual sense, he seeks spiritual edification. Making use of indirect communication, and employing language which is predominantly metaphorical and figurative, he challenges the reader to inwardly appropriate religious truth with a view to its practical expression in the ethical existence. Kierkegaard’s critique of theology does not simply question the relevance of certain theological approaches but reveals an evident contempt for academic theology and the theologians who would advocate it. Kierkegaard aligns himself with theologians of the patristic period to defend the existential nature of faith. He finds in them important allies in his battle against the complacent and amorphous Christianity that prevailed in 19th-century Denmark. It is unlikely that any consensus concerning the importance of Kierkegaard for theology will ever be agreed upon, given that the dialectic tension of his ideas resists systematization and straightforward interpretative closure. Although some aspects of his theological approach reach beyond the boundary line of Lutheran orthodoxy and come close to Catholicism, the main impetus of his theorizing is still protestant and predominantly Lutheran. For Kierkegaard the primary aim of theology lies not in reinterpreting and expounding doctrines but in spurring on the experience and practice of faith in the concrete circumstances of the believer’s existence.
	備考（Remarks）査読付き論文
2022	信心・信仰による救済ー浄土真宗とキリスト教との接点ー	単著
	真宗教学研究，真宗教学学会，第43号， 1-16 ， 2022年7月1日
	概要（Abstract）救済は、およそ宗教の最終的な目標だと言えるであろう。広義での救済は全ての宗教に見出されるものであるが、人間の苦境についての見解や救いへ至る道などはかなり多様である。浄土真宗ならば、「煩悩」という語で人間の苦境を捉えるし、キリスト教ならば、「罪」と連想される。これらは人間にとって克服困難な苦境であるが、本願力・神の恩寵によって超克され、救済が得られる。浄土真宗とキリスト教は、様々な視点から比較され、両者が数多くの類似性を持つことはよく知られているが、特に阿弥陀仏の本願力・神の恩寵による救済、信心・信仰との類似点などが、しばしば指摘されてきた。本論文ではこれらの概念を比較思想の視点から対比させ、両宗教の核心である救済の性格を考察する。
	備考（Remarks）
2021	Kierkegaard: O Militante Anticlerical [Kierkegaard: The Anticlerical Militant]	単著
	Perspectiva Teológica ， FAJE ， Vol. 53, n. 2 ， pp. 419-440 ， 2021/ May-August
	概要（Abstract） During the last year of his life, Kierkegaard launched a fierce attack on the Danish State Church and the ecclesiastical figures representing it. He accuses bishops and pastors of corruption and hypocrisy and of distorting the Christian message. The need to expose the true situation of the State Church leads Kierkegaard to resort to incendiary language. He intends to undermine the authority of the church and force the reader to question obedience to the clergy, so that the reader may be able to recognize and appropriate the true Christianity of the New Testament. The question is whether his radical criticism is an incidental aberration or the logical conclusion and culmination of his thought. The interpretations of Kierkegaard’s attack on the church vary widely. Although there are undeniable connections between his earlier and later writings, Kierkegaard’s criticism of the church cannot be considered a mere restatement of positions previously defended. The issues addressed in the earlier and later writings reveal a multiplicity of evolving viewpoints.
	備考（Remarks）査読付き論文
2020	O Indivíduo Singular e a Crítica Social em Kierkegaard [The Singular Individual and Social Criticism in Kierkegaard]	単著
	Síntese: Revista de Filosofia ， FAJE Belo Horizonte ， Vol. 47, n. 148 ， pp. 303-329 ， 2020年8月
	概要（Abstract） Kierkegaard is the thinker par excellence of the singular individual. This can be considered the central category of his thought and the thread running through his writings. For Kierkegaard, to be a singular individual is not a privilege of a few. It is a universal possibility. The existential task of each person consists in becoming the singular individual. Kierkegaard uses the category of the singular individual to examine critically the deep social changes that take place with the development of science, industrialization and the appearance of the mass media, especially the emergence of the mass society and the tendency to depersonalization inherent to it. Kierkegaard is often criticized for advocating a radical individualism that devalues the social dimension of human existence. While it is undeniable that there are passages in Kierkegaard’s writings which justify the critique of excessive individualism, the conception of the singular individual before God should be interpreted as a corrective to the distorted forms of sociality present in the mass societies of the modern age and not so much as a devaluation of the social dimension of human existence.
	備考（Remarks）査読付き論文
2019	É Racional ter Fé? Considerações sobre o Pensamento de Kierkegaard e Swinburne [Is it Rational to Believe? Some Considerations about the Thought of Kierkegaard and Swinburne]	単著
	Revista Española de Teología ， Ediciones Universidad San Dámaso ， Vo. 59, no. 1 ， pp. 37-60 ， 2019/ January-April
	概要（Abstract） The rationality of religious belief has been a focus of inquiry in the current philosophical debate. At issue is whether it is necessary or even possible to provide rational validation for religious truth claims. Richard Swinburne, one of the most ardent advocates of the rationality of religious belief, contends that there is rational justification for believing that God exists. Since the belief in the existence of God is not demonstrably incoherent, it is proper to look around us for evidence of its truth and falsity. Kierkegaard’s thought, on the contrary, represents a vigorous protest against the attempt to validate religious beliefs on the basis of rational argument. Kierkegaard argues that religious faith is a matter of choice, not of argument. The truth of religious claims is gained not through detached theoretical inquiry, but through personal commitment. Rational demonstrations are not capable to bring about faith in the person. There are no reasons to which one can appeal to negotiate the transition from unbelief to faith.
	備考（Remarks）査読付き論文
2017	A Ética Cristã do Amor em Kierkegaard [The Christian Ethic of Love in Kierkegaard]	単著
	Perspectiva Teológica ， FAJE ， Vol. 50/ no.1 ， 111-134 ， 2018/January-April
	概要（Abstract） The command of love for the neighbor is at the core Kiekegaard’s Works of Love. In this book, Christian love is defined in opposition to natural love, namely erotic love and friendship. Due to its passionate nature, natural love is a form of self-love and contains no ethical demand. In Christian love, on the contrary, the other is loved as neighbor, not on account of preference, but because God commands that love. Notwithstanding the dissimilarities between natural love and Christian love, these two forms of love are not antithetically related. From a Christian point of view, what is problematic in natural love is its egotistic exclusivity, which love for the neighbor eliminates by establishing equality in loving. The prominence given to the command of love will be considered in light of Kierkegaard simultaneous emphasis on effort and gift, works and grace, law and love. Kierkegaard’s interpretation of the doctrine of love is often criticized for neglecting the social dimension of the Christian ethics. While a certain disregard for an ethics directed to social changes is undeniably present, this does not imply disdain for the importance of promoting the social and material well-being of the human person. Kierkegaard’s concern is rather to show that there exists a qualitative difference between the practice of Christian love and the political and social expression of organized generosity.
	備考（Remarks）査読付き論文
2016	O Paradoxo da Encarnação. Crítica de Kierkegaard à Teologia Especulativa do seu Tempo (The Paradox of the Incarnation: Kierkegaard's Critique of the Speculative Theology of his Time)	単著
	Perspectiva Teológica ， FAJE, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil ， Vol. 48, n. 3 ， pp. 559-582 ， 2016/September-December
	概要（Abstract） Kierkegaard is often portrayed as the lone protester against the dominant currents of nineteenth century philosophical and theological thought. It is, however, within the field of Christology where such objections are most clearly evident. Kierkegaard developed his doctrine of the paradox in response to the use made of the Hegelian principle of mediation by the speculative theology of his time. Contrary to speculative theology, Kierkegaard argues that divine and human natures are not immanently united, but that they constitute opposing poles, separated by a qualitative infinite difference. By combining the opposing realities within it, the paradox of God’s revelation in time is contrary to any form of mediation. Some critics have interpreted the concept of the paradox as a logical contradiction. It is pointed out that by viewing faith as the only away of gaining access to the paradox, Kierkegaard is demanding that the believer put logic aside and embrace what is unintelligible to human reason. The incarnation as an object of faith, however, is not paradoxical in the sense that it violates the principles of logic, but in the sense that it absolutely transcends human understanding.
	備考（Remarks）査読付き論文
2015	Kierkegaard e o Conceito de Pecado: Paradoxo de Inevitabilidade e Responsabilidade (Kierkegaard and the Concept of Sin: Paradox of Inevitability and Responsibility)	単著
	Revista Española de Teologia ， Ediciones Universidade San Dámaso ， Vol. 76 no. 1 ， pp. 125-149 ， 2016/January-April
	概要（Abstract） The analysis of anxiety as the precondition of human freedom and sin can be considered one of Kierkegaard’s most original and notable contributions to Christian thought. Anxiety is the expression of freedom and of the spiritual nature of man. It is an ambivalent and dialectic state that derives from the indeterminate character of freedom. This study aims to examine the use Kierkegaard makes of the concept of anxiety to elucidate the corporate and personal dimensions of sin and the concomitant paradoxical relationship to these of inevitability and responsibility. Given its ambivalent and dialectic character, anxiety is not the cause of decision; it is no more than the condition that makes the decision possible. Kierkegaard describes anxiety as the dizziness of freedom. From this state of dizziness built into the nature of freedom both Adam and every subsequent human being take the unexplained leap into sin. In the concluding section I consider Balthasar’s critique of Kierkegaard’s concept of anxiety.
	備考（Remarks）査読付き論文
2013	Epistemic Probability and Existence of God: A Kierkegaardian Critique of Swinburne's Apologetic	単著
	The Heythrop Journal ， Blackwell Publishing ， vol.55 no.1 ， pp. 45-58 ， 2014年１月
	概要（Abstract） Richard Swinburne’s work is considered to be one of the most impressive achievements in the philosophy of religion of recent times. His overall intellectual project is clearly apologetic in nature: it aims to defend the coherence of theism and justify the central Christian doctrines. The aim of this paper is to set forth a critical evaluation of Swinburne’s apologetic strategy in the light of Kierkegaard’s thought.　 It will be argued that Swinburne’s apologetic strategy can hardly convince those who do not share the Christian presuppositions of faith. The belief that God exists is not a purely objective matter. Many subjective factors, such as the propensity or inclination to believe, are already operative in the very perception of evidence for the existence of God. Estimates of probability on evidence available vary greatly and there is no agreement among rational beings about what counts as evidence for the probability of God’s existence.
	備考（Remarks）査読付き論文
2013	A Existência de Deus Necessita Ser Demonstrada? Deus, Fé e Razão no Pensamento de Kierkegaard (Does God's Existence Need to be Demonstrated? God, Faith and Reason in Kierkegaard's Thought.	単著
	Síntese-Revista de Filosofia ， FAJE (Faculdade de Filosofia e Teologia de Belo Horizonte, Brasil) ， Vol. 40 no.128 ， pp. 383-405 ， 2013年12月
	概要（Abstract） The present article is a brief study on Kierkegaard’s critique of the attempt by speculative reason to demonstrate the existence of God. It will be shown that for Kierkegaard the existence of God is not a theoretical question which can be rationally demonstrated, but an eminently practical reality which discloses itself in the ethical and religious sphere of existence. Although Kierkegaard refutes the traditional proofs for the existence of God, he does not deny the possibility of the natural knowledge of God. Such knowledge, however, is obtained not objectively by the speculative reason but subjectively in the process of existing. Despite his severe critique of the attempt to provide a rational demonstration for the existence of God, Kierkegaard does not offer a mere edifying philosophy, he makes use of arguments of a practical and anthropological nature to construe a comprehensive philosophy of religious and Christian existence.
	備考（Remarks）査読付き論文

詳細表示

その他研究業績

年度 Year	題名等 Titles	カテゴリ Category	細目 Authorship
年度 Year	掲載雑誌名等 Publishing Magazine，発行所 Publisher，巻／号 Vol./no.，頁数 Page nos.，発行年月（日） Date
2021	信心・信仰による救済ー浄土真宗とキリスト教との接点	講演	単著
	大谷大学　第27回　真宗大谷派教学大会， 2021年7月10
	概要（Abstract）
	備考（Remarks）
2019	Facing Up to Real Doctrinal Difference: How some Thought-Motifs from Derrida can Nourish the Catholic-Buddhist Encounter. By Robert Magliola. Pp xvi, 206, Angelico Press, 2014	書評	単著
	The Heythrop Journal ， Wiley Blackwell ， Vol. 60/3 ， 478-479 ， 2019/05/01
	概要（Abstract）
	備考（Remarks）
2018	Philosophy of Religion: Towards a More Humane Approach. By John Cottingham. Pp. XIV, 192, Cambridge University Press, 2104.	書評	単著
	The Heythrop Journal ， Wiley Blackwell ， Vol. 60/1 ， 150-151頁， 2019/01/01
	概要（Abstract）
	備考（Remarks）
2015	Dante's Deadly Sins: Moral Philosophy in Hell. By Raymond Angelo Bellioti. Pp xvi, 199. Oxford. Wiley Blackwell, 2014.	書評	単著
	The Heythrop Journal ， Wiley Blackwell ， 56/5 ， 851-852 ， 2015/11
	概要（Abstract）
	備考（Remarks）
2012	Probability in the Philosophy of Religion. Edited by Jake Chandler &Victoria S. Harris. Pp. viii, 253, Oxford University Press, 2012.	書評	単著
	The Heythrop Journal ， Wiley Blackwell ， Vol. 54/2 ， 341-342 ， 2013/3
	概要（Abstract）
	備考（Remarks）
2011	キェルケゴールの自己論―非社会的個人主義であるのか―	発表	単著
	大谷大学，キェルケゴール協会， 2011/６
	概要（Abstract）
	備考（Remarks）
2011	Modernidade, Cultura e Religião na Ordem Política e Social do Japão	国際会議発表	単著
	Brasil/Belo Horizonte ， PUC Minas ， 2011/9
	概要（Abstract）
	備考（Remarks）
2007	Estado e Religião: Xintoísmo Estatal e a Formação do Mito da Identidade Nacional	国際会議発表	未設定
	Fátima/Portugal ， 2007/11
	概要（Abstract）
	備考（Remarks）
2004	親鸞における悪の自覚と倫理的実践?キリスト教思想と比較において?	発表	単著
	国際宗教学宗教史会議， 2005/03
	概要（Abstract）
	備考（Remarks）
2003	Budismo: Pontos de Contacto e Perspectivas de Diálogo com o Cristianismo	国際会議発表	単著
	Fátima/Portugal ， 2003/11
	概要（Abstract）
	備考（Remarks）

詳細表示

著書・学術論文に関する統計情報

年度 Academic Year	学術研究著書の件数 No. of Academic Books	学会誌・国際会議議事録等に掲載された学術論文の件数 No. of Academic Articles in Journals/Int'l Conference Papers	国内学会でのゲストスピーカーの件数 No. of Times as Guest Speaker at National Academic Conf.
2023	0	1	0
2022	0	1	0
2021	0	1	1
2020	0	1	0
2019	0	1	0
2018	0	0	0
2017	0	1	0
2016	0	1	0
2015	0	1	0
2014	2	0	0

詳細表示

2024/01/12 更新

<< 検索結果一覧に戻る

△このページの先頭へ