研究者詳細

学術論文
分割表示   全件表示 >>

28 件中 1 - 10 件目

年度
Year
論文題目名
Title of the articles
共著区分
Collaboration
   Classification
NeoCILIUS
   請求番号/資料ID
Request No
掲載誌名 Journal name,出版機関名 Publishing organization,巻/号 Vol./no.,頁数 Page nos.,発行年月(日) Date
2017  Portraits of Pilate According to Christian Canonical Writings and Jewish Historical Works. Patr three: Pilate According to the Author of Mark's Gospel  単著   
南山神学  , 41  , 21-45 (25p)  , 2018.03   

概要(Abstract) This study continues a series of presentations of Pilate found in ancient writings, this time focusing on the portrait of Pilate, the fifth prefect of Judea, found in the Gospel of Mark. Mark’s particular reason and aim for writing the Gospel shapes his particular approach not only in matters concerning the structure and content of the writing but also in his presentation of the key agents involved in his narrative. Among them, though only marginally present, but no doubt a very important agent, given Mark’s presumed audience is Pilate, for whom Mark reserved a special role.  

備考(Remarks)  

2017  Portraits of Pilate in Jewish Historical Works and Christian Canonical Writings. Part Two: Pilate in Narrative of Luke’s Gospel  単著   
ACADEMIA  , 南山大学  , 15  , pp. 63-77 (15p).  , 2018.01   

概要(Abstract) This study concerns Luke’s perspective on Pilate, the fifth prefect of Judea, as it is presented in Luke’s Gospel. Recording eight events involving the prefect, Luke shows his socio and theological understanding and the inter-operation of the event regarding Jesus’ death, which are directly related to Pilate. Luke’s account concerning Pilate does not lead to making a judgment about Pilate, but shows him rather as a mid-level official trapped between two worlds, trapped between a world where hostility and conflicts of interests could have fatal consequences, where common sense and the demands of justice and truth take second place. A place where the struggle to maintain one’s integrity makes demands almost too weighty for human fragility to bear. 

備考(Remarks)  

2017  Portraits of Pilate in Jewish Historical Works and Christian Canonical Writings. Part One: Pilate according to Josephus Flavius and Philo  単著  ISSN 2185-3282 
ACADEMIA  , 南山大学  , 14  , pp. 91-109 (19p)  , 2017.06   

概要(Abstract) This study of Pontius Pilate, fifth prefect of Judea province, who remained in office from 26 AD until 36 AD, focuses on the presentation found in the writings of two major Jewish historians; Philo and Josephus Flavius. The analysis considers all references regarding Pilate that are found in their writings. The analysis, first focuses on the texts and the information provided in them, and then on a critical interpretation of the information placed in the socio-political context of first century Roman Empire, as well as the socio-religious context in which the writing were created by the authors. This approach helps us to uncover the authors’ tendency in recording the events regarding Pilate.  

備考(Remarks)  

2017  Portraits of Pilate according to Christian Canonical Writings and Jewish Historical Works. Part three: Pilate According to the Author of Mark's Gospel  単著   
南山神学  , 教皇庁認可神学部  , 41  , 21-45  , 2018/03   

概要(Abstract) This study continues a series of presentations of Pilate found in ancient writings, this time focusing on the portrait of Pilate, the fifth prefect of Judea, found in the Gospel of Mark. Mark’s particular reason and aim for writing the Gospel shapes his particular approach not only in matters concerning the structure and content of the writing but also in his presentation of the key agents involved in his narrative. Among them, though only marginally present, but no doubt a very important agent, given Mark’s presumed audience is Pilate, for whom Mark reserved a special role.  

備考(Remarks)  

2016  The Messiah in the Trinitarian Hymn of the Letter to Ephesians. Theological Analysies of the Eulogy in Eph 1, 3-14  単著  ISSN 0287-3730 
南山神学  , 南山大学  , 40  , pp. 57-77 (21p)  , 2017.03   

概要(Abstract) The study concerns the use of the term “Christ” in the eulogy found in the Letter to the Ephesians (Eph 1, 3-14), with particular reference to the understanding of Eph 1, 11. Generally there is no doubt that the term refers to Jesus of Nazareth. However, in verse 11, although pronoun “in Him” that is equivalent of the term “Christ” is used in the same way, it is connected to another pronoun “we”, whose identification is not clear and the subject of diverse interpretations. In this study we argue for identifying the pronoun “we” with Jews, although the majority of scholars do not accept this. This interpretation directly influences the understanding of the pronoun “in Him”, which, although it still refers to Jesus of Nazareth, in this particular context (verse 11) should be taken in a more general sense as the Messiah, a concept that was created within the Jewish tradition and claimed by Christians to be personified in Jesus of Nazareth. 

備考(Remarks)  

2016  彼こそ平和をもたらす者(ミカ5,4)。平和の聖書的な概論。  単著   
アカデミア  , 南山大学  , 13  , 123-132   , 2017.01   

概要(Abstract) 本研究は新約聖書に見られる「平和」という言葉の意味に関するものである。この言葉のキリスト教的な理解とギリシャの著者達による理解との鮮明な対照を明らかにするために、εἰρήνηというギリシャ語の言葉について、短い予備的な紹介をした。「平和」という言葉のキリスト教的な理解は、ギリシャ語のεἰρήνηより、ユダヤ教の‏שָׁלוֹם‏‎‎‎ - シャーロームという言葉と多くの共通点を持つが、そのキリスト教的理解はユダヤ人の伝統が発展させたそれより、いっそう深まった。この言葉のキリスト教的理解は一般的に、人間同士の関係だけではなく、主に神と人間の関係に注意が向けられているが、それは常に終末論的な文脈においてである。 

備考(Remarks)  

2016  使徒言行録におけるルカの聖霊論   単著   
日本カトリック神学会誌  , 日本カトリック神学会  , 27号  , 101-129  , 2016.07   

概要(Abstract) 本論は使徒言行録における聖霊論に関するものである。ルカの一般的な神学的アプローチ(ポイント1)を提示した後、聖霊に関するすべてのペリコペーの分析(ポイント2)を提供する。体系化を図るため、ペリコペーを主題によってグループ分けする。本論の最後の章はルカの聖霊論の特徴(ポイント3)を含む。その特徴は本論のポイント2における分析結果に基づいて提言される。ルカの聖霊論の特徴に関する主な結論は、ルカの聖霊論が神学的論説ではなく、むしろキリスト教徒の共同体の経験に基づいているということである。 

備考(Remarks)  

2016  ロマ11におけるユダヤ人とキリスト教の関係‐パウロの教えに見るロマ11,1-36の社会的、神学的意味。  単著   
アカデミア  , 南山大学  , 12  , 91-104  , 2016.06   

概要(Abstract) 本論はロマ11, 1-36におけるパウロの教えに関するものである。この手紙の構成とそれぞれの部分の分析は、11章が新しいイスラエル(キリスト教徒)とイスラエル(イエスを拒否するユダヤ人)との関係を示す教えを含んでいることを表わしている。それはロマ11, 1-36を、キリスト教徒の共同体がクラウディウスの法令後に自分達を見出したという特別な状況の社会的、神学的な解釈を考えるという意味で、特に重要なものにしている。ロマ11, 1-36では、一部のイスラエル人がメシアとしてのイエスを拒絶しているが、それでも彼らは選ばれた民のままであると、パウロは論証している。彼らの一時的な失敗は神の救いの計画の一部と見られている。なぜなら、そのことが異邦人にイエスへの信仰を通して神との契約に入らせることを可能にしているからである。 

備考(Remarks)  

2015  Judea after Herod the Great (4 BC-67 AD) according to the writings of Josephus Flavius。  単著   
南山神学  , 南山大学  , 39号  , 47-110  , 2016.03   

概要(Abstract) The article considers history of Judea region, since the death of Herod the Great (4 BC) till the beginning of the Jewish-Roman War (66/67-70/73 AD) as it is presented by Josephus Flavius in his the Jewish War (JW 2.1-284) and the Jewish Antiquities (JA 17.191-20.268). Since Josephus exclusively concentrates on Judea, hardly mentions the two other parts of the Herod`s kingdom Galilee and Trachontis, following this approach we will present separately accounts concerning each of the regions, with special attention given to history of Judea. Although written by the same author, the two works of Josephus despite similarities in the contains, differ radically in their presentation, evaluation and purpose of writing, what forced us not to mix these two accounts but to present them separately in order to indicate how strong socio-historical circumstances can influence recording of historical events. The history of Judea region in period 4 BC-67AD can be divided into four parts, where the first (4 BC-6 AD) considers the time of the etnarchy under the rule of Archelaus, the second (6-41 AD) considers the time of the province under the rule of prefects, the third (41-44 AD) considers the time of the kingdom under the rule of Herod Agrippa I, and fourth (44-67 AD) considers the time of the province under the rule of procurators. Josephus writes short and extremely negative account concerning the first period (4 BC-6 AD). He elaborates the account concerning the second period (6-41 AD), where his criticism and negative evaluation of the prefects` rule were expressed by putting attention only to negative aspects. Josephus with unmasked proud and real delighting writes about the third period (41-44 AD) which concerns the reign of Herod Agrippa I, the descendent of the Herod Dynasty (grandfather) and the Hasmonean Dynasty (grandmother). Concerning the fourth period (44-67 AD), Josephus writes very strong criticism against not only the Roman prefects but also against the Jewish authorities including the high priests of the Temple, who are blamed for creating socio-political situation, which led to the war between Romans and Jews. This approach of Josephus has much common with his attempt to present Jewish nation as the “victim” of the native leaders and the Romans` administrators.  

備考(Remarks)  

2015  The mission to the Gentiles.The Second Mission Journey of Paul According to Acts 15, 36-18, 22  単著   
アカデミア 人文・自然科学編  , 南山大学  , 11  , 117-141  , 2016.01   

概要(Abstract) The study focuses on the second mission journey of Paul, as it is recorded by Luke in Acts 13, 1-18, 22. The schematic character of the account creates difficulties determining many details concerning the journey. The attempt of this study is to present more details concerning the mission journey. In order to achieve this aim examined the time span of Paul`s journey, so allowing us to place Luke`s narrative in its correct socio-historical background. The information concerning each of the cities that Paul was visited, helping us to understand the diversity of places, which created particular social environments that worked for or against the success or lack of success of the mission.  

備考(Remarks)  

Page: [<<PREV] [1] [2] [3] [NEXT>>]